Welding hoods on mannequin heads in destructive testing facility, multiple arc processes firing simultaneously with cascading sparks
Live Test Environment — Bay 4
Forge PPE — Materials Testing Division

Primary Test Metric — FY2026

|

The gear between your crew
and the arc.

Welding hoods, gloves, leathers, and respirators engineered for the people who build the world with molten metal. Not certified. Proven.

Arc Temp Tested10,000°F
ANSI/ISEA RatingClass 4+
Active SKUs247
Test Cycles/SKU1,400+
Case Studies Below
Case Study 01

Petrochemical Refinery — Gulf Coast, TX · 340 Welders · 2024

"
We had fourteen flash-burn incidents in one quarter. The gear we were sourcing met the spec sheet. But the spec sheet wasn't written for a reformer unit running at capacity.

Marcus Thibodeaux

Director of Safety Operations · Coastal Petrochemical Group

Forge welding hood and gloves laid out on industrial testing surface with thermal imaging overlay showing heat distribution

Thermal Imaging — Palm Zone

ΔT = 0.3°FFLAT

Deployed: FR-9 Flash Hood + P7 Gauntlet System

Arc Rating

65 cal/cm²

Lens Shade

Auto DIN 9–13

Palm Material

Aluminized Kevlar

Resp. Class

P100 + OV/AG

Outcome Data — 12-Month Post-Deployment

94%

Reduction in flash-burn incidents across the reformer unit

14 incidents per quarter → 1 minor incident over 12 months

OSHA Recordable Injuries

welding-related

110

Gear Replacement Rate

annual

340%62%

Lost Workdays

per year

473

"We re-specced the entire site on Forge within 90 days. The numbers made the decision. My team made the argument."

— Marcus Thibodeaux, CPG Safety Ops

Case Study 02

Naval Shipyard — Norfolk, VA · 580 Welders · 2023–2024

"
The respiratory incident reports were the ones that kept me up. Manganese fume exposure in a confined hull section. We had compliant respirators. Compliant wasn't enough.

Commander Denise Wakahisa (Ret.)

EHS Director · Atlantic Fleet Fabrication Command

Outcome Data — 18-Month Surveillance Window

0

Respiratory incident reports over 18 consecutive months

Previous 18-month baseline: 23 OSHA-recordable respiratory events

Respiratory Incidents

18-month period

230

Medical Surveillance Flags

per year

414

Respirator Fit-Test Failures

of workforce

18%2%

Forge deploys an on-site hazard mapping session before specifying a single SKU.

Request a Site Assessment
Welder in full respiratory protection gear working inside confined shipyard hull section with fume extraction visible

Mn Fume Exposure

0.02 mg/m³↓ 97%

Deployed: RX-3 Powered Air Purifying Respirator + Full-Face Shield

APF Rating

1000+

Filter Class

OV/P100/HE

Battery Life

10-hr Shift

Weight

2.1 lbs

"The RX-3 isn't just a respirator. It's a complete inhalation hazard management system. That distinction is what zero looks like."

— Cmdr. Wakahisa, AFFC

Case Study 03
Extreme Conditions Protocol

Offshore Pipeline Weld — Permian Basin, TX · 68 Welders · Summer 2025

"
Ambient was 130°F in the trench. My guys are welding in full leathers, full hood. I needed gear that could take the heat from two directions at once — and a crew that could finish the shift.

Rodrigo Castellanos

Field Operations Manager · Lone Star Pipeline Group

Pipeline welders working in extreme heat conditions in open trench, wearing full protective leather gear and auto-darkening hoods

Ambient Temperature

130°F

Trench floor, peak midday

Heat-Stress Pullouts

0

Full 8-week deployment

Deployed System

TH-7 Thermic Leather Suite + Arctic Vent Hood System

Core Temp Regulation

Phase-change liner

Arc Rating

100 cal/cm²

Ventilation

Passive + active dual-mode

Moisture Wicking

Class 1 FR treated

Outcome — 8-Week Field Deployment

0

Heat-stress medical pullouts

vs. 7 on previous summer deployment

100%

Shift completion rate

All 312 scheduled shifts completed

"The phase-change liner was the difference. The crew stopped complaining about the heat by day three. That tells you everything about what the gear was doing."

— Rodrigo Castellanos, LSPG

Test Data Library

The numbers don't
need our help.

Every Forge SKU ships with a complete destructive test dossier. Six independent labs. No cherry-picked conditions.

4,217

total hours

of destructive testing per product generation

ASTM F1959
1,400 cycles

Arc Thermal Performance Value Testing

Class 4 — 65 cal/cm² min.

NFPA 70E
880 cycles

Electrical Safety in the Workplace

HRC 4 Compliant

ANSI Z87.1
620 cycles

Optical Clarity Under Arc Exposure

High Impact Rated

EN 12477
2,100 cycles

Mechanical Performance — Gauntlets

Type A (Dexterity)

NIOSH 42 CFR 84
540 cycles

Respiratory Filtration Efficiency

P100 — 99.97%

ASTM F2894
960 cycles

Thermal Protective Performance — Garments

TPP ≥ 130 cal/cm²

Download the Full Test Data Library

Raw test protocols, third-party lab reports, and comparative data against leading competitors. Engineers use this to build the RFQ spec. Safety directors use it to close the argument.

No sales follow-up. Engineers get the data. That's it.

Site Assessment Program

Request a Site Assessment

A Forge hazard engineer maps your specific arc processes, confined spaces, and exposure windows before recommending a single SKU. No catalog. No guessing.

This field is read by a hazard engineer, not filtered by a sales algorithm.

No obligation. No catalog drop. A hazard engineer — not a sales rep — will be in touch.